|numbers baffle me|
Finally, we discuss a recent episode of the Comedy Channel show of Drunk History. The episode does their take on telling the story of the Fox Sisters, and we discuss if the episode was skeptical of the sisters and their claims. Unfortunately, I was unable to convince Sharon of the crude charm of the program. (Ed. note: Seriously, check out the episode with Liev Schreiber; it is awesome.)
Overall, I think the episode comes off rather nicely. If there is an unintended lesson that can be learned from the episode, it might be that skeptics do not have to agree on everything to cooperate. Whether a particular cable reality show is entertaining and modestly informative, or there is disagreement over a thorny constitutional question, just because people disagree on some issues does not mean the end of collaboration.