Monday, July 18, 2016

Pushing the Pop Band Analogy: Thoughts in a post TAM world.

Two years have passed since the first and only The Amazing Meeting I attended.  The conference was thoroughly enjoyable, and at the time recommended to skeptics who were pondering investing the time and money to attend.  Unfortunately, that conference was the last of its breed.   No other TAMs were held at the South Point Hotel, Casino & Spa outside of Las Vegas.  The following TAM was the final one, moved back to the Las Vegas strip.  A more or less self-aware swan song of a conference given the retirement of James Randi.  The originator of TAM, and a popular and influential skeptic's skeptic.  The James Randi Education Foundation itself more or less drifted out of existence or at least any public presence at this time too.

Since TAM has come to an end there has been some chatter online as to what is the next TAM or the successor to TAM.  For me, such as question is similar to asking who are the new Beatles? Sure, the Rolling Stones, Squeeze, Beatle Paul’s own Wings, even Oasis have all had some fine moments and been called the new Beatles.  Heck, the remaining living Beatles in the 1990s along with the recorded voice of John Lennon produced the songs Free As a Bird and Real Love both of which while Beatle-y was still not The Beatles.  I suspect if the JREF revamped and organized a new TAM within the next few years it might very well be a nice skeptical conference but still would still not be The Amazing Meeting.   

Skepticism and life go on.  The Merseyside skeptics, who just happened to live in Beatle-ground zero, continue to organize the well received Q.E.D. con and have some nice wins against homeopathy in Britain.  The New England Skeptical Society and The New York City Skeptics NECSS this past Spring held another successful conference along with its own modest drama with Professor Richard Dawkins and John Horgan hatchet job.  Both in the same tenor of certain TAM dramas.  CSI is having their conference in Las Vegas this Fall.  The location is very TAM.  While I feel confident that each conference will all succeed in their own way, I also suspect none of them will ever have their near universal appeal of placing Skepticism first within the realm of rationalism, outreach, or camaraderie.  

Just as music soldiered on through the 1970s without the Fab Four to impressive effect such as the rise of Elton John or Led Zeppelin.  It also sometimes was terrible like Jimmy Buffet.*  The skeptical movement appears to be doing the same with many good efforts and a few disappointments. I would not be surprised at some point in the future a new focal point will emerge and for a time generally pull skepticism together.  The new conference or organization won’t be the Beatles, but it might be Michael Jackson or Van Halen.  They had their moments too.  


As followers of this blog may note, I have been posting about once per month.  I plan to post at this reduced rate until probably the start of next year when some other personal diversions run their course.  I hope to post on a more weekly basis.  In the meantime be sure to follow Sharon Hill at her Doubtful blog. 

Friend of the blog and Astronomer Royale, Dr. Stuart Robbins, own blog and podcast have been on hiatus because he's just too damn busy with real science.  We cannot wait until he starts podcasting again. 

Stuart is cool. 

Finally fellow friend of this blog and skepticism in general, Conspiracy Skeptic Karl Mamer, has recently become engaged to be married.  We here at The Skeptical Review could not be tickled pinker for the happy couple and their family at large.  Congratulations.  
* Perhaps the ceasing of TAM avoided a JREF/TAM “Fat Elvis” period.  We’ll never know. 

Monday, June 20, 2016

Thoughts on Liverpool Skeptical Win

The practice of medicine is complicated.  One does not have to be an accredited medical provider to make such a determination. How to best practice medicine by extension ought to be left to the experts.

Placing this thought into relief was the latest episode of Skeptics with a K where Mike Hall shared that a NHS review decided, after a period of review which included public comment, that homeopathy within Liverpool, England be defunded.  My overall opinion on this matter is first, happy that a major Western metro area is not wasting money on such nonsense.  I am also in a bit of awe that skeptics were able to mobilize and actually do something concrete.  I cannot fathom American skeptics mobilizing to accomplish something similar in the somewhat similarly sized Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Monday, May 23, 2016

Horgan Affair

John Horgan.  I am not going to go into depth on Horgan's lecture at the last NECSS, or the three pieces he authored for the Scientific American blog.  I am not going to dwell into my thoughts on his work in question or into my personal refutation of them.  Dr. Steven Novella, Sharon Hill, Daniel Loxton, or the lengthy tome authored by Orac, or as discussed by Jason and Bobby on the latest strange Frequencies podcast and Virtual Skeptics latest Vlog.**  I am probably skipping others.  They all make good points, and while I do not agree with them all point for point, I more than agree with them in spirit and most detail.  Suffice it to say, I agree that one can both abhor war and promote peace* and be anti-homeopathy.  It is not a choice between guns and water. 

Monday, May 9, 2016

Monster Talk - UFOs with Robert Sheaffer

I have always had a soft spot for UFOs.  Therefore, it was with great interest that I listened while on a flight from Florida to Pennsylvania to the latest episode of Monster Talk.  Blake Smith and Karen Stollznow interviewed UFO researcher, blogger, and author, Robert Sheaffer, on his latest book Bad UFOs as well as the field in general.  The episode did not disappoint.

 As I noted in an earlier blog post, when I was in college I spent far too much time doing a literature review on everything UFOs that I could procure given that it was 1990-91 and before the internet.  Although I was not a skeptic at the time, and had no idea that Skepticism was even a thing, the chances of UFOs actually being machines control by extraterrestrial lifeforms was quite remote to me.  I am by no means comparing my efforts with Sheaffer’s far greater depth of a lifetime of research to mine.  But he did come to the same conclusion.